MP Response to Bill C-61

Posted: July 17th, 2008 | Author: Trevor Orsztynowicz | Filed under: General | 6 Comments »

Hedy Fry is our MP here in Vancouver, and this is a response that I received regarding an email I sent to her office about Bill C-61. I’m so underwhelmed by it that all I’ll do is post it and say no more.

Dear Mr. Orsztynowicz:

Thank you for your correspondence concerning Bill C-61, An Act to amend the Copyright Act.

As you are aware the previous Liberal government had tabled a Bill on this issue but it did not come to debate because of the election.  The current Conservative Bill has been eagerly awaited since they announced their intentions, in December 2007.

Canada has signed two World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) treaties, but has not yet ratified them.  The last time the Canadian Copyright Act was amended was in 1997 but these amendments did not address the WIPO treaty agreements. In the interim, communications technology has expanded rapidly.  Everyone is in agreement that the Copyright Act has to be amended to reflect the impact of digital technology.

Bill C-61 should strike a balance between the right of creators to be reimbursed for their creative, intellectual property and the desire for consumers to have access to these creative works.

Indeed digital technology serves both the creator and the consumer well.  It increases the reach and distribution of creative works as never imagined, before; which is precisely what creators need and it gives consumers easy access to creative works that can entertain, enrich, and educate.

This Bill does not serve either consumer or creator well.  It prescribes narrow, punitive solutions to a complex problem.  In fact the Bill could well have the effect of curbing the use of digital technology, to the extent that it becomes useless. This would be a pity!  As well implementation of the measures in the Bill would be nearly impossible, unless one abandons all privacy rights or imposes locks on the digital technology that severely limits its application.  How to monetize digital technology to reward the creator and allow free and open use by the consumer is challenging

As Liberals we believe that there should have been extensive consultations with legal experts, creators, distributors and conventional and digital media industries to find the right balance of solutions.  It is typical of the Harper government that they do not consult but impose.

Liberals intend to begin these consultations over the course of the summer so that when the Bill comes to the House we can propose appropriate amendments. Moreover we believe that the Bill should be further subject to public scrutiny if it ever gets to committee stage.  It could be that after we consult with the expert groups they believe that Bill C-61 is unsalvageable, in which case one would have to vote against the Bill and rewrite a new one.

These are exciting and challenging times in media communications technology that can broaden the consumption of arts and cultural products, in a manner unheard of since the invention of the printing press.  The challenges seemed impossible then but solutions were found that led to a Renaissance of art and culture.  We are at a similar point in history, now.  We must not use a sledge hammer.

Once again, thank you for writing.  Please feel free to contact my office if I may be of further assistance.

Sincerely,

Hon. Hedy Fry, M.P.
Vancouver Centre


6 Comments on “MP Response to Bill C-61”

  1. 1 Raul said at 5:03 pm on July 17th, 2008:

    Um. Disappointed at her response is an understatement. Great to see this post :)

  2. 2 Jim Pick said at 8:11 am on July 18th, 2008:

    Anybody want to organize a C-61camp?

    Get Hedy Fry in, as well as representatives from the Conservatives and NDP?

    Put them face-to-face with the local tech community, and let them talk their spiel. The pols are so out-of-touch, they actually believe that the local tech community wants this (when in fact, they only people they’ve talked with are foreign media lobbyists).

  3. 3 Raul said at 6:48 pm on July 19th, 2008:

    @ Jim – That’s a great idea. I’d be in. I have experience in public policy, and intellectual property. And my Dad is an IP lawyer.

  4. 4 Matthew said at 10:57 pm on July 20th, 2008:

    Great job for writing in… not surprised we get back “These are exciting and challenging times in media communications”. I am excited… DRM is threatening to destroy the openness of our technology. I can feel the excitement. Can you?

  5. 5 Travis Harper said at 12:55 pm on September 10th, 2008:

    This new bill has just as many cobwebs on it as the current copy right act.

    This is will not change anything. No one wins.

    Why not get embrace downloading. Why not team up with the big brand names, and add download credits to common grocery store items.
    Kind of like airmiles.

    So what if the price of corn flakes goes up 50 cents a box.

    This way everyone gets paid, and the digital generation can download from quality media, from quality servers without being policed.

    If these download credits are on everyting we buy anyway, then why would anyone download “illegally”

    Different amounts of download credits for different types of media… music, books, movies, programs.

    Simple solution to me.

    Over 100,000 boxes of corflakes are sold each month.
    thats would be $50,000 to the recording industy each month on cornflakes alone.
    Wow, think of the possibilities.

    Travis

  6. 6 Media for Social Change - CITIZENShift » Speculative Documentary: Bill C-61 said at 9:04 am on January 21st, 2009:

    [...] Response to local MP’s [...]


Leave a Reply